Du wirst angemeldet...

Bitte warte, während wir deine Anmeldung überprüfen

Artikel · Samstag, 26. September 2026

Fintech · Industry brief

Top three stories shaping Fintech today, written for someone who already works in the industry: regulation, M&A, new entrants, notable filings, and any precedent worth pulling. Cite the trade publication (e.g. trade press, government source, court docket) directly so I can follow up.

Von Marius BongartsBusiness82 Ausgaben
← Zur aktuellen Ausgabe
Ausgaben
12 / 82
Über Nacht von KI aus öffentlichen Quellen erstellt, täglich aktualisiert.
Fintech · Industry brief
Samstag, 26. September 2026
Fintech · Industry brief

Fed loosens fintech partnerships; NY cracks dealer fees; MAS enforcement widens

1 Min. Lesezeit

Fed resets fintech partnership rules

Banking regulators just yanked the handbrake on fintech partnerships.

On September 11, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, and OCC proposed revised interagency guidance on third-party risk management, explicitly acknowledging that their 2023 rules had "unduly impede[d] fintechs from entering partnerships with banking organizations" [Quelle: Sullivan & Cromwell]. The new framework ditches process-driven compliance for a streamlined, principles-based approach focused on material financial risks, with tailoring by bank size and complexity. Comment period closes November 16, 2026—get your feedback in now.

This reversal unlocks deal pipelines that regulators had quietly strangled.

New York targets hidden dealer fees

A 2% "optional" fee charged 97% of the time is mandatory, New York says.

The New York AG settled with two Westchester County dealerships on September 16 for $1 million in immediate restitution, finding that a sales commission labeled "not required by law" was misleading despite technically being optional [Quelle: Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor]. The dealerships also bundled protection products with illusory benefits and rejected two rounds of disclosure tweaks (May 2022, September 2024) as insufficient. The settlement requires standalone elected-options forms, dealer worksheets with pre-finance office pricing, and annual compliance training.

High acceptance rates on purportedly optional fees now read as evidence of de facto mandatory pricing.

MAS widens enforcement reach

Singapore's financial regulator is stepping up enforcement against individual market actors.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore issued prohibition orders against former representatives in 2026, signaling a broader enforcement agenda focused on personal accountability [Quelle: MAS]. These orders complement ongoing sector-wide sweeps and reflect a shift toward holding individuals liable for institutional conduct rather than relying on corporate remediation alone. Regional fintech platforms operating under MAS oversight should expect tighter personal liability exposure across compliance and control roles.

Watch for escalating supervision of board-level governance and individual officer conduct across Asia-Pacific.

Quellen
Enforcement Actions - Monetary Authority of Singapore
Enforcement Actions - Monetary Authority of Singapore
11 hours ago ... View the list of formal regulatory and enforcement actions taken by MAS for breaches of the Securities and Futures Act, the Financial Advisers Act and the ...
mas.gov.sg
KI-Zusammenfassung

(empty string)

Quelle öffnen
Federal Banking Agencies Propose Significant Updates to Third ...
Federal Banking Agencies Propose Significant Updates to Third ...
4 hours ago ... [33] The agencies also pursued enforcement actions related to fintech ... fintech firms from entering into partnerships with federally regulated institutions.
sullcrom.com
KI-Zusammenfassung

On September 11, 2026, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA and OCC proposed revised interagency guidance on third-party risk management that would replace their 2023 guidance. The new Proposed All-Bank Guidance emphasizes a streamlined, principles-based approach focused on material financial risks rather than process-driven compliance, and explicitly aims to reduce regulatory impediments to fintech partnerships with banking organizations. The agencies identified that the 2023 guidance was interpreted too broadly and "unduly impede[d] fintechs from entering partnerships with banking organizations." The revised guidance establishes four risk management components: identifying and assessing risks, overseeing risks proportionally, making informed decisions about residual risk acceptance, and establishing appropriate governance, with tailoring based on bank size, complexity and risk profile. Comments are due November 16, 2026. (Source: Federal Register, 91 Fed. Reg. 58,536, Sept. 15, 2026) The Federal Reserve separately proposed a non-binding Community Bank Guide for institutions under $30 billion in assets, and the Federal Reserve, FDIC and OCC issued a joint statement on community banks' relationships with core service providers, committing to risk-based supervision and potentially pursuing direct enforcement actions against core providers that unreasonably limit due diligence and contract negotiations. (Source: Federal Register, 91 Fed. Reg. 58,438–58,440, Sept. 15, 2026)

Quelle öffnen
New York AG Settlement Signals Increased Scrutiny of Dealer Fee ...
New York AG Settlement Signals Increased Scrutiny of Dealer Fee ...
6 hours ago ... Monitoring the financial services industry to help companies navigate through regulatory compliance, enforcement, and litigation issues ... enforcement actions.
consumerfinancialserviceslawmonitor.com
KI-Zusammenfassung

On September 16, the New York Attorney General's Office settled with two Westchester County dealerships over deceptive fee practices, requiring $1 million in immediate consumer restitution, millions more in claims-based payments, and $700,000 in penalties. The OAG found that a 2% "Sales Commission" charge applied to 96–97% of transactions was not adequately disclosed as optional, despite being labeled "not required by law"—language the regulator found ambiguous and misleading. The dealerships also bundled aftermarket protection products priced up to $2,495 with illusory benefits and poor disclosure; a "collision credit" was only reimbursable if the consumer leased another vehicle from the same dealership within 60 days. The settlement prohibits both dealerships from charging any sales commission fee or offering similar bundled add-on products going forward, and mandates standalone elected-options forms requiring affirmative written consent, dealer worksheets showing negotiated pricing before finance office entry, and mandatory annual compliance training. The OAG rejected two rounds of incremental disclosure revisions (May 2022 and September 2024) as insufficient to cure the underlying labeling problem, signaling to industry participants that regulators treat high acceptance rates on purportedly optional fees and mislabeled charges as evidence of de facto mandatory pricing regardless of stated optionality.

Quelle öffnen
Über Nacht zusammengestellt von MorningMail.aiZugestellt um 00:40